<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>START VPN - Compare &#38; Find all the Best VPN Service &#38; VPN Reviews &#187; 13897</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.start-vpn.com/tag/13897/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.start-vpn.com</link>
	<description>Find the Best Personal VPN Service at the best price! Compare Providers &#38; Reviews, Offers, Free Trials &#38; Promo...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Strong VPN &#8211; VPN consumer review &#8211; 13897</title>
		<link>http://www.start-vpn.com/vpn/strong-vpn-vpn-consumer-review-13897/</link>
		<comments>http://www.start-vpn.com/vpn/strong-vpn-vpn-consumer-review-13897/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VPN?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13897]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.start-vpn.com/vpn/strong-vpn-vpn-consumer-review-13897/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In search of a reliable VPN-provider, the weight of the many positive reviews on this site was
significant to me.  I use StrongVPN now and plan buy a second package to fulfill all my needs.
It works flawless and I notice no problems concerning speed loss or instabilty.
Towards my application bandwidth is of lesser importance however, I do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In search of a reliable VPN-provider, the weight of the many positive reviews on this site was<br />
significant to me.  I use StrongVPN now and plan buy a second package to fulfill all my needs.</p>
<p>It works flawless and I notice no problems concerning speed loss or instabilty.<br />
Towards my application bandwidth is of lesser importance however, I do not apply it to download<br />
so I can&#8217;t say anything about that.</p>
<p>Help (support) is splendid.<br />
The operators are professional and friendly.<br />
Experienced and interested as they are, they will help you out in no time.</p>
<p>But they&#8217;re also needed.<br />
The interface (there actually isn&#8217;t any real interface) is not always that clear. Some things are<br />
pretty well hidden and certain people (noobs like me) may find themselves happy support is<br />
so accurate.<br />
A bit dissapointing is that there is a limit on the times one can switch to another server.<br />
Maybe it was announced and I just didn&#8217;t read well enough. To me it was unexpected<br />
that I will have to pay extra for switches once a limit is exceeded.<br />
The switching is not at all as easy as announced.<br />
It has to be done manually (at least once for most people to ged rid of the standard US-<br />
server which is appointed after the initial setup). But it is not a big deal eather, and there&#8217;s<br />
always support &#8230;<br />
A bit of reading and understanding has to be done. The site seemed willing to offer me<br />
a one-month account but in the end I had to buy three months at least. Ok, just the usual<br />
commercial sh*t, but still regrettable for a provider which certainly can be described as<br />
serious and reliable.<br />
About the same commercial humbug is an automated offer I received shortly after my<br />
subscription.<br />
It stated that I would be given a 15 USD discount if I brought in a new subscriber on<br />
their VPN. Since I already was planning a second VPN I asked whether the discount<br />
would be submitted if I brought myself in. The new account would have to be payed<br />
for normally as if it was from anyone else. It was rejected, friendly but absolutely.<br />
Why don&#8217;t they just leave this kind of commerce away, it only has negative impact<br />
while technically their product is quite ok.<br />
Before subscribing to StrongVPN I had contact with other providers (also found<br />
here on the site but apparently removed in the mean time) and at least one of them<br />
was obviously fraudulent. So I believe all that false advertising only causes<br />
inconvenience and distrust and is not needed by a quality supplier.</p>
<p>I recommend StrongVPN.<br />
- It is not the cheapest provider but it works and support is great.<br />
- See trough the advertising (it seems to be normal on the net nowadays).<br />
- Do not worry because the setup and switching have to be done manually (even though<br />
  the advertising states &#8216;easy switching&#8217;). It is not that hard after all.<br />
- Trustworthyness of StrongVPN is my argument in favor of them. And probably the most<br />
  important there is.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.start-vpn.com/vpn/strong-vpn-vpn-consumer-review-13897/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
